CDN & DNS Providers · reliability comparison
Amazon Route 53 vs deSEC: which is more reliable? (2026)
deSEC is more reliable than Amazon Route 53, scoring 100.0 vs 89.2 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Amazon Route 53 reported 1 incident and deSEC reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | deSEC |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 89.2 | 100.0 |
| Rank (CDN & DNS providers) | #3 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Amazon Route 53 and deSEC differ
- deSEC reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Amazon Route 53 reported 1.
90-day uptime
Amazon Route 53
deSEC
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Amazon Route 53 incidents
- Degraded performanceSep 15, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Service is operating normally: [RESOLVED] Amazon Route 53 Operational Issue
Recent deSEC incidents
No incidents reported by deSEC in the last 90 days.
Other CDN & DNS providers to consider
- DNSimple · #1 · 99.94% uptime
- Amazon CloudFront · #2 · 100% uptime
- Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS · #4 · 99.85% uptime
- Bunny.net · #5 · 99.83% uptime