Appointment Scheduling Software · reliability comparison

Chili Piper vs Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8): which is more reliable? (2026)

Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) is more reliable than Chili Piper, scoring 100.0 vs 60.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Chili Piper reported 1 incident and Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.44% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

MetricChili PiperSign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8)
Reliability score60.6100.0
Rank (scheduling apps)#7#4
Uptime (90 days)99.44%100%
Incidents (90 days)10
Partial / major outages10
Avg time to resolve23h 53m—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Chili Piper and Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) differ

  • Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Chili Piper reported 1.
  • Chili Piper had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8).
  • Chili Piper's longest outage on record lasted 23h 53m (Sep 15, 2026); Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8)'s lasted 3h 39m (Jan 23, 2026).

90-day uptime

Chili Piper

Aug 4, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026: no incidentsSep 15, 2026: 86.36% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Sep 16, 2026: 63.86% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Sep 17, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.447% average daily uptimeToday

Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8)

Aug 4, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Chili Piper incidents

Full Chili Piper reliability report →

Recent Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) incidents

No incidents reported by Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) in the last 90 days.

Full Sign In Scheduling (formerly 10to8) reliability report →

Other scheduling apps to consider

See the full most reliable appointment scheduling software ranking →