Social Media Management Tools · reliability comparison
CoSchedule vs Later: which is more reliable? (2026)
CoSchedule is more reliable than Later, scoring 100.0 vs 90.1 out of 100. Over the last 90 days CoSchedule reported 0 incidents and Later reported 2, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.89% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | CoSchedule | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 90.1 |
| Rank (social media management tools) | — | #2 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.89% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 2 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 2 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 1h 40m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where CoSchedule and Later differ
- CoSchedule reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Later reported 2.
- Later had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for CoSchedule.
90-day uptime
CoSchedule
Later
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent CoSchedule incidents
No incidents reported by CoSchedule in the last 90 days.
Recent Later incidents
- Major outageSep 8, 2026 · resolved in 1h 17m
Later Social cannot be accessedofficial update ↗
Affected: General Site
- Partial outageAug 13, 2026 · resolved in 2h 2m
Mavely accounts are unable to connect to Later Socialofficial update ↗
Other social media management tools to consider
- Planable · #1 · 99.98% uptime
- SocialBee · #3 · 100% uptime
- Vista Social · #4 · 99.86% uptime
- Sprout Social · #5 · 99.68% uptime
See the full most reliable social media management tools ranking →