CDN & DNS Providers · reliability comparison
Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS vs IBM NS1 Connect: which is more reliable? (2026)
IBM NS1 Connect is more reliable than Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS, scoring 90.0 vs 84.7 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS reported 1 incident and IBM NS1 Connect reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.85% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS | IBM NS1 Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 84.7 | 90.0 |
| Rank (CDN & DNS providers) | #4 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.85% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 1 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 6h 8m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Where Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS and IBM NS1 Connect differ
- IBM NS1 Connect reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS reported 1.
- Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for IBM NS1 Connect.
90-day uptime
Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS
IBM NS1 Connect
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Google Cloud CDN & Cloud DNS incidents
- Partial outageOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 6h 8m
Multiple services were experiencing issues in the europe-west2 region.official update ↗
Affected: AlloyDB for PostgreSQL, Apigee, BigQuery Data Transfer Service, Cloud Data Fusion, Cloud Filestore, Cloud Firestore +32 more
Recent IBM NS1 Connect incidents
No incidents reported by IBM NS1 Connect in the last 90 days.
Other CDN & DNS providers to consider
- DNSimple · #1 · 99.94% uptime
- Amazon CloudFront · #2 · 100% uptime
- Amazon Route 53 · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bunny.net · #5 · 99.83% uptime