Web Hosting · reliability comparison
Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) vs SiteGround: which is more reliable? (2026)
Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) is more reliable than SiteGround, scoring 90.0 vs 80.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) reported 0 incidents and SiteGround reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) | SiteGround |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 90.0 | 80.0 |
| Rank (web hosts) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 50/100 | 0/100 |
90-day uptime
Hosting.com (A2 Hosting)
SiteGround
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) incidents
No incidents reported by Hosting.com (A2 Hosting) in the last 90 days.
Recent SiteGround incidents
No incidents reported by SiteGround in the last 90 days.
Other web hosts to consider
- Namecheap Hosting · #1 · 100% uptime
- Flywheel · #2 · 100% uptime
- Pressable · #3 · 100% uptime
- DreamHost · #4 · 100% uptime