Push Notification Services · reliability comparison
MagicBell vs Webpushr: which is more reliable? (2026)
MagicBell and Webpushr are effectively tied on reliability (100.0 vs 100.0). Over the last 90 days MagicBell reported 0 incidents and Webpushr reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | MagicBell | Webpushr |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Rank (push notification services) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
90-day uptime
MagicBell
Webpushr
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent MagicBell incidents
No incidents reported by MagicBell in the last 90 days.
Recent Webpushr incidents
No incidents reported by Webpushr in the last 90 days.
Other push notification services to consider
- Novu · #1 · 100% uptime
- Pushwoosh · #2 · 99.99% uptime
- Courier · #3 · 99.99% uptime
- Expo Push Notifications · #4 · 99.93% uptime
See the full most reliable push notification services ranking →