Web Hosting · reliability comparison
Namecheap Hosting vs SiteGround: which is more reliable? (2026)
Namecheap Hosting is more reliable than SiteGround, scoring 89.2 vs 80.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Namecheap Hosting reported 1 incident and SiteGround reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Namecheap Hosting | SiteGround |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 89.2 | 80.0 |
| Rank (web hosts) | #1 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 1 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 0/100 |
Where Namecheap Hosting and SiteGround differ
- SiteGround reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Namecheap Hosting reported 1.
90-day uptime
Namecheap Hosting
SiteGround
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Namecheap Hosting incidents
- MaintenanceOct 31, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
[COMPLETED] EMERGENCY SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE ON SHARED SERVER 343| October 31, 2026
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
[RESOLVED] PHP Security Vulnerability affecting Hosting Services | October 21, 2026
Recent SiteGround incidents
No incidents reported by SiteGround in the last 90 days.
Other web hosts to consider
- Flywheel · #2 · 100% uptime
- Pressable · #3 · 100% uptime
- DreamHost · #4 · 100% uptime
- GoDaddy Web Hosting · #5 · 99.49% uptime