Managed Database Services · reliability comparison
Nhost vs Prisma Postgres: which is more reliable? (2026)
Nhost is more reliable than Prisma Postgres, scoring 100.0 vs 93.3 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Nhost reported 0 incidents and Prisma Postgres reported 2, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.96% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Nhost | Prisma Postgres |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 93.3 |
| Rank (managed database services) | — | #2 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.96% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 2 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 2h 29m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Nhost and Prisma Postgres differ
- Nhost reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Prisma Postgres reported 2.
- Nhost's longest incident on record lasted 2h 8m (Mar 10, 2026); Prisma Postgres's lasted 2h 30m (Jun 18, 2026).
90-day uptime
Nhost
Prisma Postgres
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Nhost incidents
No incidents reported by Nhost in the last 90 days.
Recent Prisma Postgres incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 15, 2026 · resolved in 3h 54m
Intermittent Connection Errors on Prisma Postgres
Affected: Prisma Compute
- Degraded performanceSep 22, 2026 · resolved in 1h 5m
Degraded performance on Prisma Postgres for some users in US East.
Affected: Prisma Postgres
Other managed database services to consider
- Upstash · #1 · 100% uptime
- PlanetScale · #3 · 99.92% uptime
- Neon · #4 · 100% uptime
- Convex · #5 · 99.87% uptime
See the full most reliable managed database services ranking →