Managed Database Services · reliability comparison
Nhost vs Tiger Data (Timescale): which is more reliable? (2026)
Nhost is more reliable than Tiger Data (Timescale), scoring 100.0 vs 80.4 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Nhost reported 0 incidents and Tiger Data (Timescale) reported 7, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.76% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Nhost | Tiger Data (Timescale) |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 80.4 |
| Rank (managed database services) | — | #7 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.76% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 7 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 3 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | 2h 9m |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Nhost and Tiger Data (Timescale) differ
- Nhost reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Tiger Data (Timescale) reported 7.
- Tiger Data (Timescale) had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Nhost.
- Nhost's longest incident on record lasted 2h 8m (Mar 10, 2026); Tiger Data (Timescale)'s lasted 8h (Apr 21, 2026).
90-day uptime
Nhost
Tiger Data (Timescale)
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Nhost incidents
No incidents reported by Nhost in the last 90 days.
Recent Tiger Data (Timescale) incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 28, 2026 · resolved in 1h 24m
[Azure ServiceHealth] Network Infrastructure - West Europe - Resolved
- Major outageOct 9, 2026 · resolved in 1h 31m
Tiger Cloud Databases running on Azure West Europe Regionofficial update ↗
- Partial outageOct 8, 2026 · resolved in 27m
- Degraded performanceSep 24, 2026 · resolved in 38m
- Partial outageSep 22, 2026 · resolved in 4h 9m
Resolved - Degraded state in Azure Germany West Centralofficial update ↗
- Degraded performanceSep 16, 2026 · resolved in 6h 14m
Other managed database services to consider
- Upstash · #1 · 100% uptime
- Prisma Postgres · #2 · 99.96% uptime
- PlanetScale · #3 · 99.92% uptime
- Neon · #4 · 100% uptime
See the full most reliable managed database services ranking →