Cloud Storage & Office Suites · reliability comparison

Proton Drive vs SugarSync: which is more reliable? (2026)

SugarSync is more reliable than Proton Drive, scoring 99.2 vs 77.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Proton Drive reported 3 incidents and SugarSync reported 2, with effective uptime of 99.65% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score

MetricProton DriveSugarSync
Reliability score77.099.2
Rank (cloud storage & office suites)#7#2
Uptime (90 days)99.65%100%
Incidents (90 days)32
Partial / major outages30
Avg time to resolve3h 11m—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Proton Drive and SugarSync differ

  • Proton Drive reported 50% more incidents than SugarSync over the last 90 days (3 vs 2).
  • Proton Drive had 3 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for SugarSync.
  • Proton Drive's longest outage on record lasted 4h 27m (Jan 16, 2026); SugarSync's lasted 1d 13h (Apr 12, 2026).

90-day uptime

Proton Drive

Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026: no incidentsAug 26, 2026: 92.92% uptime, 1 incident (Major outage)Aug 27, 2026: 98.11% uptime, 1 incident (Major outage)Aug 28, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026: no incidentsSep 1, 2026: 91.39% uptime, 1 incident (Partial outage)Sep 2, 2026 – Oct 1, 2026: no incidentsOct 2, 2026: 86.29% uptime, 1 incident (Major outage)Oct 3, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.652% average daily uptimeToday

SugarSync

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Proton Drive incidents

Full Proton Drive reliability report →

Recent SugarSync incidents

Full SugarSync reliability report →

Other cloud storage & office suites to consider

See the full most reliable cloud storage & office suites ranking →