Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
Semaphore vs Travis CI: which is more reliable? (2026)
Travis CI is more reliable than Semaphore, scoring 89.7 vs 55.7 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Semaphore reported 21 incidents and Travis CI reported 0, with effective uptime of 98.96% and 99.99% respectively.
Data updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | Semaphore | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 55.7 | 89.7 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | #9 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 98.96% | 99.99% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 21 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 5 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 4h 10m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 1 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Where Semaphore and Travis CI differ
- Travis CI reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Semaphore reported 21.
- Semaphore had 5 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Travis CI.
- Semaphore's longest outage on record lasted 10h 5m (Aug 31, 2026); Travis CI's lasted 5h 14m (May 25, 2026).
- Our own probes detected 0 outages at Semaphore and 1 at Travis CI, of which 0 and 0 respectively were acknowledged on their status pages.
90-day uptime
Semaphore
Travis CI
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Semaphore incidents
- Degraded performanceOct 29, 2026 · resolved in 1h 25m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved in 3h 14m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 26, 2026 · resolved in 2h 41m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 22, 2026 · resolved in 2h 15m
Affected: Semaphore
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved in 3h 47m
Affected: Semaphore
- InformationalOct 20, 2026 · resolved in 2h 1m
Affected: Semaphore
Recent Travis CI incidents
No incidents reported by Travis CI in the last 90 days.
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →