Code Hosting & CI/CD · reliability comparison
SourceHut vs Travis CI: which is more reliable? (2026)
SourceHut is more reliable than Travis CI, scoring 100.0 vs 89.7 out of 100. Over the last 90 days SourceHut reported 0 incidents and Travis CI reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 99.99% respectively.
Data updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | SourceHut | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 100.0 | 89.7 |
| Rank (code hosting & CI platforms) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 99.99% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 1 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Where SourceHut and Travis CI differ
- Our own probes detected 0 outages at SourceHut and 1 at Travis CI, of which 0 and 0 respectively were acknowledged on their status pages.
90-day uptime
SourceHut
Travis CI
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent SourceHut incidents
- MaintenanceOct 19, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Recent Travis CI incidents
No incidents reported by Travis CI in the last 90 days.
Other code hosting & CI platforms to consider
- Bitrise · #1 · 99.90% uptime
- Depot · #2 · 99.89% uptime
- GitLab · #3 · 100% uptime
- Bitbucket · #4 · 99.74% uptime
See the full most reliable code hosting & ci/cd platforms ranking →