E-Signature Software · reliability comparison
Adobe Acrobat Sign vs Juro: which is more reliable? (2026)
Juro is more reliable than Adobe Acrobat Sign, scoring 100.0 vs 61.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Adobe Acrobat Sign reported 16 incidents and Juro reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.28% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | Adobe Acrobat Sign | Juro |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 61.6 | 100.0 |
| Rank (e-signature tools) | #10 | #2 |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.28% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 16 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 2 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 4h | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where Adobe Acrobat Sign and Juro differ
- Juro reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Adobe Acrobat Sign reported 16.
- Adobe Acrobat Sign had 2 partial or major outages, compared with 0 for Juro.
- Adobe Acrobat Sign's longest outage on record lasted 1d 4h (Sep 17, 2026); Juro's lasted 10h 12m (Mar 23, 2026).
90-day uptime
Adobe Acrobat Sign
Juro
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent Adobe Acrobat Sign incidents
- Degraded performanceNov 1, 2026 · resolved in 28m
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved in 12m
- Degraded performanceOct 27, 2026 · resolved in 3h 24m
- Degraded performanceOct 25, 2026 · resolved in 1m
- Degraded performanceOct 21, 2026 · resolved in <1m
Recent Juro incidents
No incidents reported by Juro in the last 90 days.