Auto Repair Shop Software · reliability comparison
AutoLeap vs NAPA TRACS: which is more reliable? (2026)
AutoLeap is more reliable than NAPA TRACS, scoring 80.0 vs 40.0 out of 100. Over the last 90 days AutoLeap reported 0 incidents and NAPA TRACS reported 0, with effective uptime of 100% and 96.85% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
VS
| Metric | AutoLeap | NAPA TRACS |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 80.0 | 40.0 |
| Rank (auto repair shop management systems) | — | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 100% | 96.85% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 0 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 0 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | — | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 3 |
| Transparency score | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Where AutoLeap and NAPA TRACS differ
- Our own probes detected 0 outages at AutoLeap and 3 at NAPA TRACS, of which 0 and 0 respectively were acknowledged on their status pages.
90-day uptime
AutoLeap
NAPA TRACS
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent AutoLeap incidents
No incidents reported by AutoLeap in the last 90 days.
Recent NAPA TRACS incidents
No incidents reported by NAPA TRACS in the last 90 days.
Other auto repair shop management systems to consider
See the full most reliable auto repair shop software ranking →