Business Banking · reliability comparison

Mercury vs Starling Business: which is more reliable? (2026)

Starling Business is more reliable than Mercury, scoring 100.0 vs 56.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days Mercury reported 5 incidents and Starling Business reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.22% and 100% respectively.

Data updated Nov 2, 2026 · How we score

MetricMercuryStarling Business
Reliability score56.6100.0
Rank (business banking providers)#4—
Uptime (90 days)99.22%100%
Incidents (90 days)50
Partial / major outages00
Avg time to resolve19h—
Outages we detected00
Transparency score100/100100/100

Where Mercury and Starling Business differ

  • Starling Business reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while Mercury reported 5.
  • Mercury's longest incident on record lasted 3d (Oct 7, 2026); Starling Business's lasted 20m (Jul 15, 2026).

90-day uptime

Mercury

Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026: no dataSep 1, 2026: 99.60% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 2, 2026: 98.69% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Sep 3, 2026 – Oct 1, 2026: no incidentsOct 2, 2026: 99.18% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 3, 2026 – Oct 6, 2026: no incidentsOct 7, 2026: 98.89% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 8, 2026: 85.00% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 9, 2026: 85.00% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 10, 2026: 86.10% uptime, 1 incident (Degraded performance)Oct 11, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago99.245% average daily uptimeToday

Starling Business

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026: no incidents
90 days ago100% average daily uptimeToday

Recent Mercury incidents

Full Mercury reliability report →

Recent Starling Business incidents

No incidents reported by Starling Business in the last 90 days.

Full Starling Business reliability report →

Other business banking providers to consider

See the full most reliable business banking providers ranking →