iGaming Payment Providers · reliability comparison
PaymentIQ vs Payper: which is more reliable? (2026)
Payper is more reliable than PaymentIQ, scoring 100.0 vs 95.6 out of 100. Over the last 90 days PaymentIQ reported 3 incidents and Payper reported 0, with effective uptime of 99.98% and 100% respectively.
Data updated Nov 1, 2026 · How we score
| Metric | PaymentIQ | Payper |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability score | 95.6 | 100.0 |
| Rank (iGaming payment providers) | #2 | — |
| Uptime (90 days) | 99.98% | 100% |
| Incidents (90 days) | 3 | 0 |
| Partial / major outages | 1 | 0 |
| Avg time to resolve | 23m | — |
| Outages we detected | 0 | 0 |
| Transparency score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Where PaymentIQ and Payper differ
- Payper reported no incidents in the last 90 days, while PaymentIQ reported 3.
- PaymentIQ had 1 partial or major outage, compared with 0 for Payper.
90-day uptime
PaymentIQ
Payper
- No incidents
- Degraded
- Partial outage
- Major outage
- No data
Recent PaymentIQ incidents
- MaintenanceSep 25, 2026 · resolved in 15m
Maintenance in progress: Scheduled Maintenance – Authentication Service Upgrade
- Degraded performanceSep 9, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
Maintenance completed: Database maintenance - PaymentIQ Production Database
- Degraded performanceSep 3, 2026 · resolved (duration not published)
- Major outageAug 29, 2026 · resolved in 23m
Recent Payper incidents
No incidents reported by Payper in the last 90 days.
Other iGaming payment providers to consider
- PayRetailers · #1 · 99.99% uptime
- Volt · #3 · 99.96% uptime
- emerchantpay · #4 · 99.97% uptime
- MiFinity · #5 · 100% uptime
See the full most reliable igaming payment providers ranking →